Schlenker, Philippe. 2005. "Transparency (An Incremental Theory
of Presupposition Projection)". Manuscript, UCLA & Institut Jean-Nicod
[Full
paper in pdf]
Abstract: The analysis of presupposition projection lead researchers
to posit in the early 1980's that the meaning of a clause should be viewed
as its Context Change Potential rather than as its truth conditions (Stalnaker
1974, Heim 1983). We argue that this 'dynamic turn' was misguided, and that
it leads straight into a dilemma: either one follows Stalnaker in his pragmatic
analysis, in which case one obtains a beautiful analysis of presupposition
projection in conjunctions, but not of much else; or one follows Heim
in her semantic analysis, which yields broader empirical coverage but little
explanatory depth (no predictions are made about connectives whose Context
Change Potential was not stipulated to begin with). We briefly sketch an alternative
account, entirely developed within classical logic. We argue that in some
cases a complex meaning m is conceptualized as involving a precondition
p, with m=pp' (Division) In this
case a pragmatic principle, Be Articulate!, requires that if possible
m should be expressed as a conjunction p and pp'
rather than as pp' (in order to make explicit the special
status of the pre-condition p). If so, why can pp'
ever be pronounced on its own? Because a principle of Minimization
sometimes rules out the full conjunction p and pp', leaving
pp' as the sole contender. Specifically, Minimization
prohibits any sentence S from starting with α[p and if it can be ascertained
that no matter how S will end the string p and could be deleted from
S without modifying its contextual meaning. This derives a principle of Transparency,
which suffices to obtain Heim's projection results, but which has the advantage
of making predictions about connectives that she does not consider. We end
the paper with some speculations about the Principle of Division,
and suggest (but do not show) that it is itself pragmatic in nature.
An Extended Abstract (6 pages) [presenting a somewhat different theory]
appeared in the Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium 2005
[pdf]