Schlenker, Philippe: 2016, Outline of Music Semantics
[Summary]. Manuscript, Institut Jean-Nicod and New York University.
[LingBuzz]
[This is a summary of 'Prolegomena to Music Semantics'
[http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/002925], which discusses several issues
that are omitted here – notably: the role of emotions in music
semantics, music pragmatics, and the radical differences between
music semantics and linguistic semantics.]
Abstract: We provide the
outline of a semantics for music. We take music cognition to be
continuous with normal auditory cognition, and thus to deliver
inferences about 'virtual sources' of the music (as in Bregman's
Auditory Scene Analysis). As a result, sound parameters that trigger
inferences about sound sources in normal auditory cognition produce
related ones in music – as is the case when decreasing loudness signals
the end of a piece because the source is gradually losing energy, or
moving away. But what is special about music is that it also triggers
inferences on the basis of the movement of virtual sources in tonal
pitch space, which has points of stability (e.g. a tonic chord), points
of instability (e.g. dissonant chords), and relations of attractions
among them (e.g. a dissonant chord tends to be resolved). In this way,
gradual movement towards a point of tonal stability, as in a cadence,
may also serve to signal the end of a piece, but on the basis of tonal
information. The challenge is thus to develop a framework that
aggregates inferences from normal auditory cognition and tonal
inferences. We sketch such a framework in a highly simplified case, by
arguing that a source undergoing a musical movement m is true of an
object undergoing a series of events e just in case there is a certain
structure-preserving map between m and e. Thus we require that
inferences triggered by loudness on the relative levels of energy or
proximity among events should be preserved, and similarly for tonal
inferences pertaining to the relative stability of events. This yields
a 'bare bones' version of a music semantics, as well as a definition of
'musical truth'. It is obtained from entirely different means from
truth in language: musical inferences are drawn by treating music as
the 'auditory trace' of some abstract sources, and not by a
compositional procedure. We then argue that this framework can help
re-visit some aspects of musical syntax. Specifically, we take (Lerdahl
and Jackendoff's) grouping structure to reflect the mereology
('partology') of events that are abstractly represented in the music –
hence the importance of Gestalt principles of perception (rather than
of a generative syntax) in defining musical groups. We further
speculate that the headed nature of groups ('time-span reductions')
might reflect a more general tendency to analyze sub-events as being
more or less important for events they are part of.